More Dating Nonsense

<<< Previous Entry: Political News | This Month's entries | Next Entry: In The Pub >>

So, as I endeavour to think about the long and hard consequences of my dissertation on dating I ponder this question: "What is the difference between dating and marriage?" And then I think why should I ponder when other people can answer the question for me?

Update


Obviously I know the standard differences between dating and marriage, that marriage has a level of commitment that dating doesn't and that marriage has a sexual intimacy that dating doesn't (well, in my opinion shouldn't). But other than that are there any other differences? Is there a difference in the level of exclusivity? Is there some mystical thing in marriage that doesn't exist in dating?


Your Comments

Kerron

What course are you doing exactly? Bit bizarre.

Hmm, I guess that if you were married it is less likely for your partner to go to France and cop of with some random punter then come back and dump you.

But I wouldn't know anything about that. :-(

Or is it that dating generally last longer than marriage these days? ;-)

Call me a cynic.

:-)

the real Phil Brown

Dating's more expensive

Gareth

How do you know that marriage is more expensive phil?!!!????!!!

Hayles

you dont wear a ring on your 3rd finger on your left hand........

the real Phil Brown

*deleted joke about Gareth and Phil, due to Gareth's current work/possible child protection issues*

Kev

He doesnt wear a ring, theres just a band of lighter coloured skin...

A. Random

You've pretty much answered your own question there haven't you?

If you're looking for a theological / 'mystical' distinction, then the Song of Songs should give you a bit of a hint.

Marriage is supposed to be the union of two distinct partners through a conjunction of their wills, thus making marriage into the sacramental figure of a (perfected) human relationship with God. That is to say, that Man and God are united in will and made equal (in regard though not in quality / substance) by and through love.

Marriage then, is supposed to help the believer to apprehend the invisible through his experience of a concrete human relationship. It is distinct from dating in that it affirms the union of the will and not just of the body. What is desired / willed on both parts is a continuation of desire for the other partner, which is supposed to make marital desire self-sustaining. Simple physical desire can, by contrast, be extinguished in its fulfillment.

Hope you don't mind a random butting in.

Gareth

A tenner says that A. Random stole all that from a text book.......

Sparticus

Stolen from a book or not that the sort of thing I'm after. Maybe it does make sense to look at it from a sacramental (though not in the sacraments sense) perspective. I mean, if that is what marriage is for, (and I think I've heard a john piper talk where he says that's what sex is for as well) then it makes sense to tackle it like that. Hmm, more things to ponder.


About, Navigation, And Other Details

This is a website by Mark Walley. If you want to find out more or get in touch, that'd be nice.

Getting around this website can be a tad confusing. If you're looking to explore the better stuff of what I've written then this navigation should help you. If you're after a specific post then searching or looking through the archives chronologically may help.

Things I Found Interesting

People I Generally Find Interesting

Last Words

This site tries its best to be accessible for everyone. Atom, and RSS feeds are available. All content licensed through a creative commons licence. I may have stolen ideas off you when you weren't looking, but it was almost certainly an accident. As with all claims of originality and ownership Psalm 24 v1 applies.